Community Context and Sentencing Decisions: a Multilevel Analysis

نویسنده

  • Noelle E. Fearn
چکیده

This dissertation uses data on a large sample of felony defendants processed in a nationally representative sample of large urban counties, in conjunction with data on the characteristics of the jurisdictions in which their cases were adjudicated, to examine the influence of community characteristics on sentencing decisions. Drawing on prior theoretical and empirical research, hierarchical linear and generalized linear models (HLMs and HGLMs) are estimated to determine whether various characteristics of the jurisdictions (e.g., racial composition, age structure, sex ratio, political affiliation, religious affiliations, geographic location, unemployment rates, violent crime rates, and sentencing guidelines) affect the likelihood that criminal defendants receive harsher punishments, net of other factors associated with these outcomes. In addition, this research examines whether community characteristics condition the effects of defendant age, race, and sex on sentencing, including whether any observed race disparities in sentencing outcomes vary in magnitude across jurisdictions and, if so, whether contextual features such as racial composition, age structure, or sex ratio help to explain that variation. With one notable exception, the results from a series of logistic, multinomial, and linear multilevel models suggest that the community characteristics included in the analysis do not affect the in/out incarceration decision, the likelihood of prison versus probation/fine, jail versus probation/fine, prison versus jail, or the sentence length imposed on convicted defendants. Religious affiliation-measured as the percent of community residents who are Protestant--exerted a consistent positive effect on the sentence length outcome. Specifically, convicted defendants adjudicated in counties with a relatively larger proportion of Protestants receive longer custodial sentences than convicted defendants in other counties. The findings also indicate that none of the community characteristics condition the effects of defendant age, race, or sex on any of the sentencing outcomes. However, there is statistically significant variation in each of these sentencing outcomes, across the counties included in the analyses. Due to the null effects observed for most of the community characteristics and the significant amount of sentencing variation, across counties, to be explained, the limitations, strengths, and implications of the present findings are discussed and future research goals outlined.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Multilevel Analysis of County and State Variation in the Severity of Sentences Imposed in Large Urban Courts

This study explored the structural sources behind variability in the sentences applied to felons convicted in state courts located across the U.S. Multilevel regression models were used to explore whether various state and county-level attributes help to account for why defendants experience a significantly higher probability of incarceration versus probation in certain jurisdictions. Drawing u...

متن کامل

Exploring methods to investigate sentencing decisions.

The determinants of sentencing are of much interest in criminal justice and legal research. Understanding the determinants of sentencing decisions is important for ensuring transparent, consistent, and justifiable sentencing practice that adheres to the goals of sentencing, such as the punishment, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation of the offender, as well as reparation for the vict...

متن کامل

Mandatory Sentencing

Adam Graycar Director There is a widely held belief that the imposition of a mandatory sentence for a second or third offence will have a significant deterrent effect on that individual and will send a message to potential offenders. Advocates argue that it will bring consistency in sentencing and appease public concern about crime and punishment. This proposition has been debated vigorously in...

متن کامل

Teen Court Jurors’ Sentencing Decisions

Teen Courts provide a forum in which juvenile offenders are sentenced by their peers. This system, based on principles of restorative justice, serves as an alternative to the traditional juvenile justice system. Sentencing options typically include restitution, community service, jury duty, apologies, attendance at educational workshops, and tours of correctional facilities. Previous research h...

متن کامل

Analysis of alternative punishments in the light of judicial rulings(Emphasis on free public service penalties)

With the approval of the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 2013, the Iranian legislator introduced some of the community-based punishments into the legal literature of the country which their effectiveness requires the provision of various contexts at different levels of legislation, judiciary and administration.The present article has tried to critique alternative sentencing sentences as a unit of...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003